Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Refelection

It was better, the old style was outdated and created a lot of unanswered questions. With this new technology we have we put it to use effectively. The idea that we have connection 24/7 gives students a chance to look assignments up and have comments on them. This allows full communication and availability for everyone. We could ask other students questions as well as finding their perspective on topics. Probably next time, it can start earlier because adapting to new teaching styles does take time and the class was having some trouble getting in the new momentum. I liked Clark 111 because it got everyone involved and had a professional feel to learning. The laptops gave students an organized approach to English class.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Assessing assessments

What resources did you not get and why?
The book resource because it is a brick of information that has to read through in order to find a perfect piece of data. I also have the video source to get down just because there are so many for YouTube it is hard to narrow down but there is a couple of videos that I plan to use. than my interview feels weak ad need to get more people to open up more windows of discussion.
Have you assessed your resources effectively?
Yes, most of the ones I had turned in but some need better in depth information to make my research paper go beyond the surface. They seem valid for now but may change down the road.

sources and reflection

My sources were sort of easy to find, mostly online. They related really well and gave me more insight to what I really wanted to write about. It was easier to write this way because it broke everything down and organized it. The database gave me an easier time in creating relevant information because it has abstracts of what it was about and I did not need to read the entire article to see if it was a good source.

Monday, April 20, 2009

interview

Me: Have you been to YouTube before and surfed for videos.
Friend: Yeah, when I am bored and need to kill time.
Me: What interests you the most about YouTube
Friend: it is the numerous videos and variety of subjects it relates to, especially, the video tutorials with step-by-step instructions.
Me: Would you say YouTube invades others privacy
Friends: Yeah, but it is all on that person to be careful with what they do
Me: Yeah, recently politicians have noticed the power of YouTube, it can make or break you.
Friend: of course, YouTube may be doing others a favor but at the same time people can be hurt from embarrassing moments forever.
Me: What if you found a video of yourself online that had you pictured in a bad light.
Friend: probably post a response video to clear my name or make a spoof off of it and create something comedic.
Friend: The advantages of YouTube are plenty but they have to be used in the right way.
Me: True, free advertisement is a lot of money saved in the pocket.
The functions of YouTube create a user-friendly place that has been influencing the media. The exposure has been notified through underground taboo music enthusiasts and political campaigns. The public awareness hits people of all ages and interests. The relations of keywords can connect two random interests into one subject. Ex. Comedic spoofs of presidential campaigns.

newspaper

The reach of YouTube goes from the mainstream entertainment to the underground spiritual side we do not see everyday. It can provide for those who do no fit societies general entertainment. For example, there are monks who became famous for posting a chant video online to YouTube.
Though they are based at the world's second-oldest Cistercian monastery, established in 1133 and 10 miles west of Vienna, the monks were discovered in a very modern way, by responding via YouTube to advertisements seeking medieval chanters. They beat more than 100 other entries from around the world.
Their exposure would not have been as successful if they did not have an internet portal to enter to let the world know about their chanting skills. Who knew people would like them enough to get them signed by Universal Records. The influence YouTube has and the questions it answers are what make it popular. It pushes a taboo style to the public and brings back fans. The open-minded users of YouTube are felt and strengthened when something like chanting monks is propelled into commercial record companies.

magazine

Media was only available when the company service provided it, now it is being recorded and viewed anytime they wish. The strength of the media was noticed when the presidential election between Kennedy and Nixon. The people who viewed the television sought favor of Kennedy but those who listened heard favor in Nixon. The expansion of YouTube and the focus in on Presidential campaigns created a one-stop place to view everything, from campaign ads to campaign speeches.
Since then, campaigns have been trying to get a handle on YouTube, a tool that can be a politician's best friend or worst enemy-able to showcase opponents' flaws, deliver new mixes of politainment and offer the prospect of pitches longer than 30 seconds.
This puts a nozzle on politicians and controls their flow, because they know now the power of YouTube. It can change a whole persons race for a political office if something faulty is recorded. People can let the world know by one click that he/she said one statement and it can forever decide the decision of some voters. YouTube operates for the people and by the people therefore making it easier for common America to see whom the best person for office is. It is a strong influence because people can also break into details with comments and offer links to further support their stance.

journal

YouTube has a handle on their network of video connections. It is a sound network that has the best way for viewers to express their opinions through videos or comments. It is strongly considered a network because of the mass influence it has in our society. As stated by James Tier,
I explained that a mosh pit associated with punk and grunge live music, is a space that typically forms close to the stage where a band plays and where people engage in a spontaneous performative act (I can’t really call it dancing) that, looking at it from the margins seems to be a whirl of seemingly chaotic yet spontaneously patterned movement in which people are basically moving into one another, brushing by one another, and sometimes slamming into one another. The movement happens in a sort of circling, crisscrossing, suddenly about-face fashion while the band plays a typically loud and fast song.
He refers to the to state of YouTube as a place where this mosh pit type behavior occurs. Through the commenting and opinions expressed people interact with one another as if they were in a mosh pit. It reflects the instances and spontaneous behavior that are captured on YouTube. This signifies it is a justifiable network that can sure enough have an effect on how media is perceived by the world by having almost anyone put some noteworthy views that can lead to a wide array of options.